General Surgery

doi: 10.25005/2074-0581-2020-22-4-572-579
OUR EXPERIENCE OF 4360 LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY FOR CHOLELITHIASIS

F.B. Bokiev1, F.Sh. Rashidov1,2, D.A. Rakhmonov1,2, Sh.Sh. Amonov1,2

1Department of Endoscopic Surgery, Republican Scientific Center for Cardiovascular Surgery, Dushanbe, Republic of Tajikistan
2Department of Surgical Diseases № 2 named after Academician N.U. Usmanov, Avicenna Tajik State Medical University, Dushanbe, Republic of Tajikistan

Objective: Analysis of our own experience in performing laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LCE) for cholelithiasis (CHL).

Methods: The study is based on the results of 4360 LCE in patients with cholelithiasis. Among the patients, women predominated – 3732 (85.6%), the average age of patients was 52.0±3.5 years. The structure of nosologies: chronic calculous cholecystitis – 3310 (75.9%), acute calculous cholecystitis – 1050 (24.1%). The operations were performed under general endotracheal anaesthesia with carbon dioxide insufflations; the location of the operating team was of the «American» type.

Results: LCE was performed in 96.5% of patients, access conversion to open surgery was required in 3.5% of cases. The most common causes of conversion were the presence of a massive adhesive process (59.6%) and destructive changes in the walls of the gallbladder (9.93%). In the ICU, the operated patients were observed on average for 4±2.5 hours, the postoperative stay of patients in the hospital ward was 1.7±1.2 days. Immediate postoperative complications were noted in 1.63% of cases, mortality was 0.13%.

Conclusion: Based on their own experience, the authors agree with the postulate that the LCE is the «gold standard» in gallbladder surgery in patients with gallstone disease. At the same time, purposeful preoperative preparation, careful selection of patients, high qualification of the surgeon, as well as adequate postoperative management of patients are the main factors in achieving good outcome. The complexity of surgical techniques can be reduced by collectively addressing complex situations of general somatic status by the active involvement of associated professionals.

Keywords: Gallstone disease, laparoscopic cholecystectomy, conversion, early postoperative complications.

Download file:


References
  1. Wang B, Ding YM, Nie YG. The clinical evaluation of laparoscopic transcystic duct common bile duct exploration in elderly choledocholithiasis. Hepatogastroenterology. 2014;61:892-6.
  2. Zerem E, Omerovic S, Guzin Z, Imsirovic B. What is the optimal treatment for acute cholecystitis in elderly patients? European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology. 2013;25(6):749. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1097/ meg.0b013e32835df294
  3. Kurbanov FS. Аliev YuG, Chinnikov MA, Panteleeva IS, Popovich VK, Sushko AN, i dr. Laparoskopicheskaya kholetsistektomiya pri ostrom kholetsistite [Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis]. Khirurgiya. 2014;2:16-8.
  4. Grigorieva IN, Malyutina SK, Voevoda MI. Rol’ giperlipidemii pri zhyolchnokamennoy bolezni [Role of hyperlipidemia in cholelithiasis]. Eksperimental’naya i klinicheskayal gastroenterologiya. 2010;4:64-8.
  5. Polunina TE. Zhyolchnokamennaya bolezn’ [Cholelithiasis]. Lechashchiy vrach. 2005;2:34-8.
  6. Maksimov VA. Patologiya gepatobiliarnoy sistemy i biliarnaya nedostatochnost’ [Pathology of the hepatobiliary system and biliary insufficiency]. Moscow, RF: Adamant; 2013. 494 p.
  7. Medzhidov RT, Ibragimov MA. Slozhnye i nereshyonnye problemy laparoskopicheskoy kholetsistektomii [Complex and unsolved problems of laparoscopic cholecystectomy]. Annaly khirurgii. 2011;1:35-9.
  8. Gurusamy KS, Davidson BR. Surgical treatment of gallstones. Gastroenterology Clinics. 2010;39(2):229-31.
  9. Pisanu A, Reccia I, Uccheddu A. Meta-analysis of prospective randomized studies comparing single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) and conventional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CMLC). Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery. 2012;16(9):1790-801.
  10. Sazhin VP, Yudin VA, Sazhin IV, Nuzhdikhin AV, Osipov VV, Podyablonskaya IA, i dr. Operationnye riski i ikh profilaktika pri laparoskopicheskoy kholetsistektomii [Operational risks and their prevention in laparoscopic cholecystectomy]. Khirurgiya. 2015;6:17-20. Available from: https://doi.org/10.17116/ hirurgia2015617-20
  11. Kais H, Нershkovitz Y, Abu-Snina Y, Chikman B, Halevy A. Different setups of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: conversion and complication rates: a retrospective cohort study. International Journal of Surgery. 2014;12(12):1258-61. Available from: https://doi:org/10.1016 /j.ijsu/2014.10006
  12. Tarasenko SV, Zaytsev OV, Tylenov DO, Yudin VA, Kopeykin AA, Natalskiy AA, i dr. Rasprostranyonnost’ oslozhnyonnykh form zhyolchnokamennoy bolezni [Prevalence of complicated forms of gallstone disease]. Nauka molodykh. 2018;6(2):218-24. Available from: https://doi.org/10.23888/ HMJ201862218-224
  13. Bittner R. The standard of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2004;389(3):157-63. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423- 004-0471-1
  14. Syrakos T, Antonitsis P, Zacharakis E, Takis A, Manousari A, Bakogiannis K, et al. Small-incision (mini-laparotomy) versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a retrospective study in a university hospital. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2004;389(3):172-7.
  15. Kurbanov DM, Rasulov NI, Ashurov AS. Oslozhnenie laparoskopicheskoy kholesistektomii [Complication of laparoscopic cholecystectomy]. Novosti khirurgii. 2014;22(3):366-73
  16. Giger U, Michel JM, Vonlanthen R, Becker K, Kocher T, Krahenbuhl L. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis: indication, technique, risk and outcome. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2005;390:373-80. Available from: https:// doi.org/10.1007/s00423-004-0509-4
  17. Ivashkin VT, Maev IV, Baranskaya EK, Okhlobystin AV, Shulpekova YuO, Trukhmanov AS, i dr. Rekomendatsii Rossiyskoy gastroenterologicheskoy assotsiatsii po diagnostike i lecheniyu zhyolchnokamennoy bolezni [Gallstone disease diagnosis and treatment: guidelines of the Russian gastroenterological association]. RZHGGK. 2016;3:64-80.
  18. Lutsevich OE. Ostryy kholetsistit: vozmozhnosti laparoskopicheskoy khirurgii [Acute cholecystitis: possibilities of laparoscopic surgery]. Annaly khirurgicheskoy gepatologiii. 2020;25(3);63-70. Available from: https://doi. org/10.16931/1995-5464.2020363-71
  19. Natroshvilli IG, Prudkov MI. Naskol’ko aktivnoy dolzhna byt’ khirurgicheskaya taktika lecheniya bol’nykh ostrym kholetsistitom [How active should be surgical tactic in treatment of acute cholecystitis?]. Vestnik RUDN. 2019;23(2):156- 67. Available from: https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-0245-2019-23-2-156-167
  20. González-Rodríguez FJ, Paredes-Cotoré JP, Pontón C, Rojo Y, Flores E, Luis-Calo ES, Barreiro-Morandeira F, et al. Early or delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis? Conclusions of a controlled trial. Hepatogastroenterology. 2009;56:11-6.
  21. Kulikovskiy VF, Yarosh AL, Karpachev AA, Soloshenko AV, Nikolaev SB, Bitenskaya EP, i dr. Zhyolcheistechenie posle kholetsistektomii. Opyt primeneniya maloinvazivnykh metodov lecheniya [Bile leakage after cholecystectomy. Experience of using minimally invasive treatment methods]. Khirurgiya. 2018;4:36-40. Available from: https://doi.org/10.17116/hirurgia 2018436-40
  22. Davlatov SS, Khidirov ZE, Nasimov AM. Differentsirovannyy podkhod k lecheniyu bol’nykh sindromom Mirizzi [Differentiated approach to the treatment of patients with Mirizzi syndrome]. Nauchno-metodicheskiy zhurnal Academy. 2017;2:95-8.
  23. Kulikovskiy VF, Karpachev AA, Yarosh AL, Frantsev CP, Nikolaev CB, Vlasyuk YuYu, i dr. Sravnitel’naya otsenka endoskopicheskikh i traditsionnykh vmeshatel’stv v lechenii zabolevaniy organov pankreatoduodenal’noy zony [Comparative assessment of endoscopic and traditional interventions in the treatment of diseases of the organs of the pancreatoduodenal zone]. Nauchnye vedomosti Belgorodskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Meditsina. Farmatsiya. 2014;27(18):24-31.
  24. Galperin EI, Chevokin AYu. “Svezhie” povrezddeniya zhyolchnykh protokov [“Fresh” damage to the bile ducts]. Khirurgiya. 2010;10:4-10.
  25. Rogal ML, Novikov SB, Magomedbekov MM, Kudryashova NE, Mironov AV. Vybor taktiki khirurgicheskogo lecheniya bol’nykh s ostrym kholetsistitom, oslozhnyonnym kholedokholitiazom [Choice of tactics for surgical treatment of patients with acute cholecystitis complicated by choledocholithiasis]. Khirurgiya. 2018;4:41-5. Available from: https://doi.org/10.17116/hirurgia2018441- 45
  26. Makhmadov FI, Kurbonov KM, Rafikov SR, Kuzratov FH, Azizov ZA. Analiz neposredstvennykh rezul’tatov “trudnoy” laparoskopicheskoy kholetsistektomii [Analysis of immediate results of “difficult” laparoscopic cholecystectomy]. Zdravookhranenie Tadzhikistana. 2014;4:32-9.
  27. Kubachev KG, Mukhiddinov ND, Zarkua NE, Fokin AM. Yatrogennye povrezhdeniya vnepechyonochnykh zhyolchnykh protokov pri laparoskopicheskoy kholetsistektomii [Iatrogenic damages of the extrahepatic bile ducts during laparoscopic cholecystectomy]. Vestnik Akademii meditsinskikh nauk Tadzhikistana. 2017;4:32-6.
  28. Gerasimenok DS, Grigorenko EA, Kartun LV, Mitkovskaya NP. Kardiovaskulyarniy risk u patsientov s ostrym kal’kulyoznym kholetsistitom [Cardiovascular risk in patients with acute calculus cholecystitis]. Neotlozhnaya kardiologiya i kardiovaskulyarnye riski. 2017;1(1):65-71.

Author information:


Bokiev Fatkhullo Bakhshulloevich
Candidate of Medical Sciences, Head of the Department of Endoscopic Surgery, Republican Scientific Center for Cardiovascular Surgery
Researcher ID: ABD-4776-2020
ORCID ID: 0000-0003-2807-2324
SPIN: 5254-1132
E-mail: fathullo-@mail.ru

Rashidov Fakhriddin Shamsiddinovich
Candidate of Medical Sciences, Senior Researcher of the Science Department, Republican Scientific Center for Cardiovascular Surgery; Associate Professor of the Department of Surgical Diseases № 2 named after Academician N.U. Usmanov, Avicenna Tajik State Medical University
ORCID ID: 0000-0001-5316-1607
E-mail: rashidovfsh@mail.ru

Rakhmonov Dzhamakhon Akhmadovich
Candidate of Medical Sciences, Director of the Republican Scientific Center for Cardiovascular Surgery; Assistant of the Department of Surgical Diseases № 2 named after Academician N.U. Usmanov, Avicenna Tajik State Medical University
Researcher ID: AAT-2441-2020
ORCID ID: 0000-0002-4427-0155
SPIN: 4201-0747
E-mail: jama-7878@mail.ru

Amonov Shukhrat Shodievich
Doctor of Medical Sciences, Surgeon of the Department of Endoscopic Surgery, Republican Scientific Center for Cardiovascular Surgery; Assistant of the Department of Surgical Diseases № 2 named after Academician N.U. Usmanov, Avicenna Tajik State Medical University
Researcher ID: AAT-8820-2020
ORCID ID: 0000-0002-3702-6584
SPIN: 8501-8830
E-mail: shuhrat.amonov@yandex.ru

Information about support in the form of grants, equipment, medications

The authors did not receive financial support from manufacturers of medicines and medical equipment

Conflicts of interest: No conflict

Address for correspondence:


Bokiev Fatkhullo Bakhshulloevich
Candidate of Medical Sciences, Head of the Department of Endoscopic Surgery, Republican Scientific Center for Cardiovascular Surgery

734003, Republic of Tajikistan, Dushanbe, Sanoi str., 33

Tel.: +992 (918) 843248

E-mail: fathullo-@mail.ru

Materials on the topic: