Literature Reviews

doi: 10.25005/2074-0581-2020-22-4-595-605
PROBLEMS OF SECONDARY RHINOPLASTY

K.P. Artykov1,2, K.N. Azizov2, E.Kh. Ismoilov2

1Department of Surgical Diseases № 2 named after Academician N.U. Usmanov, Avicenna Tajik State Medical University, Dushanbe, Republic of Tajikistan
2Republican Scientific Center for Cardiovascular Surgery, Dushanbe, Republic of Tajikistan

Every year, there has been a steady increase in the number of rhinoplasty. At the same time, the patient’s demands for these surgery are also increasing. Therefore, unsatisfactory functional and aesthetic results after rhinoplasty require repeated (revision) operations. The secondary rhinoplasty itself is more complex than the primary operation. Incorrectly performed rhinoplasty and iatrogenic tissue damage lead to deformities that require repeated reconstructive interventions. The reasons for the unsatisfactory results of rhinoplasty can be different. In assessing the results of rhinoplasty, the surgeon’s opinion may not be ambiguous with the patient. Often, when the surgeon considers the rhinoplasty result to be acceptable, the patient may be unhappy. In the postoperative period, deformities of the tissues of the nose may be due to the rough scars, and an infectious process. Еxcessive cartilage resection, insufficient or excessive osteotomy lead to deformities that require repeated reconstructive interventions. For secondary rhinoplasty, it is necessary to take into account all tissue deformations to eliminate them in one stage. Sometimes after the second, third or more operations performed, the result of revision rhinoplasty is difficult to predict, so the surgeon must predict the expected outcome result.

Keywords: Secondary rhinoplasty, nasal meatus, nasal septum deviation, septoplasty.

Download file:


References
  1. Neaman KC, Boettcher AK, Do VH, Mulder C, Baca M, Renucci JD, Vander Woude DL. Cosmetic rhinoplasty: revision rates revisited. Aesthet Surg J. 2013;33(1):31-7. Available from: https://doi. org/10.1177/1090820X12469221
  2. Ors S, Ozkose M, Ors S. Comparison of various rhinoplasty techniques and long-term results. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2015;39(4):465-73. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-015-0497-5
  3. Bagheri SC, Khan HA, Jahangirnia A, Rad SS, Mortazavi H. An analysis of 101 primary cosmetic rhinoplasties. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012;70(4):902-9. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2011.02.075
  4. Pshenisnov KP. Obshchie voprosy. Kozha i ee porazheniya. Golova i sheya. T. 1. V: Pshenisnov KP. (red.) Kurs plasticheskoy khirurgii: Rukovodstvo dlya vrachey. V 2 t. [General issues. Skin and lesions. Head and neck. V. 1. In: Pshenisnov KP. (ed.) Plastic Surgery Course: A Guide for Physicians] Yaroslavl, RF: Rybinskiy dom pechati; 2010: 628 p.
  5. Daykhes NO, Lipskiy KB, Sidorenkov DA, Aganesov GA, Pimanchev PV, Strelkova NK. Vosstanovlenie oporosposobnosti nosovoy peregorodki pri vtorichnoy rinoplastike [Restoring support ability of the nasal septum in secondary rhinoplasty]. Meditsinskiy sovet. 2015;15:92-6.
  6. Karlsson TR, Shakeel M, Al-Adhami A, Suhailee S, Ram B, Ah-See KW. Revision nasal surgery after septoplasty: trainees versus trainers. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2013;270(12):3063-7. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/ s00405-012-2162-9
  7. Rehman A, Hamid S, Ahmad M, Rashid AF. A prospective study of nasal septal deformities in Kashmiri population attending a tertiary care hospital. International Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery. 2012;1:77-84. Avaliable from: https://doi.org/10.4236/ijohns.2012.13016
  8. Alotaibi AD. The common complications after septoplasty and septorhinoplasty: A report in a series of 127 cases. International Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery. 2017;6:71-8. Avaliable from: https://doi. org/10.4236/ijohns.2017.66010
  9. Spataro E, Piccirillo JF, Kallogjeri D, Branham GH, Desai SC. Revision rates and risk factors of 175842 patients undergoing septorhinoplasty. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2016;18(3):212-9. Avaliable from: https://doi.org/10.1001/ jamafacial.2015.2194
  10. Roozbahany AN, Khajavi M, Abbaszadeh H. Complication of conventional septoplasty. Journal of Hear Sci Otolaryngol. 2015;1(1):1-4. Available from: https://doi.org/10.22037/orlfps.v1i1.9419
  11. Belousov AE. Ocherki plasticheskoy khirurgii. T. 3: Khirurgi i patsienty [Essays on Plastic Surgery. Vol. 3: Surgeons and patients]. Moscow, RF: Prakticheskaya meditsina; 2015. 136 p
  12. Didenko VV, Gusakov AD, Didenko VI. Evolyutsiya morfo-funktsional’nykh proyavleniy flotatsii peregorodki nosa posle khirurgicheskoy korrektsii eyo deformatsii [Evolution of morphological and functional manifestations flotation nasal septum after surgical correction of deformation]. Rossiyskaya otorinolaringologiya. 2011;3:40-5.
  13. Lopatin AS. Rinit: Rukovodstvo dlya vrachey [Rhinitis: A Guide for Physicians]. Moscow, RF: Litterra; 2010. 424 p.
  14. Piskunov GZ, Piskunov SZ. (eds.) Rukovodstvo po rinologii [Rhinology guide]. Moscow, RF: Litterra; 2011. 960 p.
  15. Belousov AE. Funktsional’naya rinoplastika [Functional rhinoplasty]. Saint Petersburg, RF: Izd-vo Politekhnicheskogo universiteta; 2010. 512 p.
  16. Kurbanov UA, Davlatov AA, Janobilova SM, Kholov ShI, Kurbanov ZA. Reduktsionnaya rinoplastika [Reduction rhinoplasty]. Vestnik Avitsenny [Avicenna Bulletin]. 2016;4:29-33.
  17. Ikromov MK, Kholmatov DI, Mahmudnazarov MI. Esteticheskie i funktsional’nye aspekty rinoseptoplastiki pri razlichnykh patologiyakh nosa [Aesthetic and functional aspects of rhinoseptoplasty in various pathologies of nose]. Vestnik Avitsenny [Avicenna Bulletin]. 2011;2:29-35.
  18. Austin GK, Shockley WW. Reconstruction of nasal defects: contemporary approaches. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016;24(5):453-60. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1097/MOO.0000000000000295
  19. Rusetskiy YuYu, Lopatin AS, Sobolev VP. Nosovoy klapan. Chast’ I: Anatomo- fiziologicheskaya sushchnost’, klinicheskie proyavleniya i metody diagnostiki pri ego disfunktsii [The nasal valve. Part I. Anatomical and physiological nature, clinical manifestations of dysfunction and methods for its diagnostics]. Vestnik otorinolaringologii. 2012;2:79-84.
  20. Mahmudnazarov MI, Tuydiev ShSh. Sovremennye metody khirurgicheskogo lecheniya deformatsiy nosovoy peregorodki [Modern methods of surgical treatment of nasal septum deformations]. Vestnik Avitsenny [Avicenna Bulletin]. 2012;4:56-61.
  21. Lin JK, Wheatley FC, Handwerker J, Harris NJ, Wong BJ. Analyzing nasal septal deviations to develop a new classification system: a computed tomography study using MATLAB and OsiriX. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2014;16(3):183-7. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamafacial.2013.2480
  22. Delaney SW. Evolution of the septoplasty: Maximizing functional and aesthetic outcomes in nasal surgery. M J Otol. 2018;1(1):004
  23. Tsang CLN, Nguyen T, Sivesind T, Cervin A. Long-term patient-related outcome measures of septoplasty: a systematic review. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2018;275(5):1039-48. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405- 018-4874-y
  24. Sam A, Deshmukh PT, Patil C, Jain S, Patil R. Nasal septal deviation and external nasal deformity: a correlative study of 100 cases. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012;64(4):312-8. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/ s12070-011-0311-x
  25. Jang YJ, Wang JH, Lee BJ. Classification of the deviated nose and its treatment. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008;134(3):311-5. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1001/archoto.2007.46
  26. Nolst-Trenite GJ. Rhinoplasty: a practical guide to functional aesthetic surgery of the nose. The Hague, Netherlands: Kugler Publications; 1998. 100 p.
  27. Daniel RK, Sajadian A. Secondary rhinoplasty: management of the overresected dorsum. Facial Plast Surg. 2012;28(4):417-26. Available from: https:// doi.org/10.1055/s-0032-1319840
  28. Erdogan BA, Avseren E, Paksoy M, Bora F, Altin G. Assessing quality of life in septorhinoplasty patients with two different instruments. B-ENT. 2013;9(4):277-83.
  29. Lee JW, Baker SR. Correction of caudal septal deviation and deformity using nasal septal bone grafts. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2013;15(2):96-100. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1001/2013.jamafacial.73
  30. Moore M, Eccles R. Objective evidence for the efficacy of surgical management of the deviated septum as a treatment for chronic nasal obstruction: a systematic review. Clin Otolaryngol. 2011;36(2):106-13. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-4486.2011.02279.x
  31. Gold M, Boyack I, Caputo N, Pearlman A. Imaging prevalence of nasal septal perforation in an urban population. Clin Imaging. 2017;43:80-2. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinimag.2017.02.002
  32. Moon IJ, Kim SW, Han DH, Kim ST, Min YG, Lee CH, et al. Predictive factors for the outcome of nasal septal perforation repair. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2011;38(1):52-7. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anl.2010.05.006
  33. Tomblinson CM, Cheng MR, Lal D, Hoxworth JM. The impact of middle turbinate concha bullosa on the severity of inferior turbinate hypertrophy in patients with a deviated nasal septum. Am J Neuroradiol. 2016;37(7):1324-30. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4705
  34. Daniel RK. The conundrum of the depressor septi nasi muscle. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;134(3):480e-481e. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1097/ PRS.0000000000000418
  35. Çakır B, Öreroğlu AR, Daniel RK. Surface aesthetics in tip rhinoplasty: A stepby- step guide. Aesthet Surg J. 2014;34(6):941-55. Available from: https://doi. org/10.1177/1090820X14537643
  36. Calvert JW, Patel AC, Daniel RK. Reconstructive rhinoplasty: operative revision of patients with previous autologous costal cartilage grafts. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;133(5):1087-96. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1097/ PRS.0000000000000119
  37. Lipskiy KB, Sidorenkov DA, Aganesov GA, Malakhov AA, Strelkova NK. Ispol’zovanie izmel’chyonnogo khryashcha pri vtorichnoy rinoplastike [Experience of using diced cartilage in secondary rhinoplasty]. Annaly plasticheskoy, rekonstruktivnoy i esteticheskoy khirurgii. 2016;1:34-41.
  38. Kim HK, Chu LS, Kim JW, Park B, Kim MK, Bae TH, Kim WS. The viability of diced cartilage grafts wrapped in autogenous fascia and AlloDerm® in a rabbit model. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2011;64(8):e193-200. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2011.02.003
  39. Hodgkinson DJ, Valente PM. The versatile posterior auricular fascia in secondary rhinoplasty procedures. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2017;41(4):893-7. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-017-0824-0
  40. Tremp M, Haack S, Mijuskovic B, Haug M. Suture techniques and cartilage grafts in nasal tip surgery: An algorithm in primary and secondary rhinoplasty. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery. 2020;73(3):563-70. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2019.09.023
  41. Ayrapetyan AD. Detali khirurgicheskoy dissektsii nadkhryashchnichno-nadkostnichno- myshechnogo sloya spinki nosa pri otkrytoy rinoplastike [Details of surgical dissection of the perichondreal-periosteal-muscular layer at the dorsum of the nose during open rhinoplasty]. Annaly plasticheskoy, rekonstruktivnoy i esteticheskoy khirurgii. 2015;2:41-5.
  42. Calvert J, Kwon E. Techniques for diced cartilage with deep temporalis fascia graft. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2015;23(1):73-80. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsc.2014.09.005
  43. Pascali M, Gentile P, Di Pasquali C, Bocchini I, Cervelli V. The auricular cartilage in 197 secondary and tertiary rhinoplasties. J Craniofac Surg. 2016;27(2):339- 44. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000002380
  44. Shokrollahi K, Taylor JP, Le Roux CM, Ashton MW, Rozen WM, Jones NS, Payne A. The postauricular fascia: classification, anatomy, and potential surgical applications. Ann Plast Surg. 2014;73(1):92-7. Available from: https://doi. org/10.1097/SAP.0b013e31826cb2b5
  45. Menezes AS, Guimarães JR, Breda M, Vieira V, Dias L. Septal and turbinate surgery: is overnight essential? Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2018;275(1):131- 8. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-017-4813-3
  46. Ayrapetyan AD. Ispol’zovanie autotransplantata iz nadkhryashchnitsy ushnoy rakoviny dlya korrektsii konturnykh deformatsiy nosa pri povtornoy rinoplastike [The application of an auricular perichondrial autotransplant for the correction of contour deformations of the nose during secondary rhinoplasty]. Annaly plasticheskoy, rekonstruktivnoy i esteticheskoy khirurgii. 2014;2:49- 54.
  47. Karaaltin MV, Batioglu-Karaaltin A, Orhan KS, Demirel T, Guldiken Y. Autologous fascia lata graft for contour restoration and camouflage in tertiary rhinoplasty. J Craniofac Surg. 2012;23(3):719-23. Available from: https://doi. org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e31824dbb92
  48. da S Neto MP, de S Almeida ÉC, da C C Tiveron LR, da Cunha MTR, Medeiros AG, Etchebehere RM. Use of the autologous membrane in structured rhinoplasty: An alternative to camouflaging and filling. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020;8(8):e3056. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1097/ GOX.0000000000003056
  49. Xing L, Almeida DR, Belliveau MJ, Hollands H, Devenyi RG, Berger A, et al. Ophthalmic artery occlusion secondary to fat emboli after cosmetic nasal injection of autologous fat. Retina. 2012;32(10):2175-6. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0b013e31826a6897
  50. Kreutzer C, Hoehne J, Gubisch W, Rezaeian F, Haack S. Free diced cartilage: A new application of diced cartilage grafts in primary and secondary rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;140(3):461-70. Available from: https://doi. org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000003622
  51. Friedman O, Coblens O. The conchal cartilage butterfly graft. Facial Plast Surg. 2016;32(1):42-8. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1598041
  52. Cingi C, Muluk NB, Ulusoy S, Söken H, Altıntoprak N, Şahin E, Ada S. Nasal tip sutures: Techniques and indications. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2015;29(6):e205- 11. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2500/ajra.2015.29.4236
  53. Baykal B, Erdim I, Kayhan FT, Oghan F. Comparative analysis of nasal deformities according to patient satisfaction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014;72(3):603. e1-7. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2013.11.025
  54. Dini GM, Iurk LK, Ferreira MC, Ferreira LM. Grafts for straightening deviated noses. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;128(5):529e-537e. Available from: https:// doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e31822b6989
  55. Pearlman SJ, Talei BA. An anatomic basis for revision rhinoplasty. Facial Plast Surg. 2012;28(4):390-7. Available from: https://doi. org/10.1055/s-0032-1319836
  56. Gubisch W, Dacho A. Aesthetic rhinoplasty plus brow, eyelid and conchal surgery: pitfalls – complications – prevention. GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013;12:Doc07. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3205/ cto000099
  57. Arslan E, Gencel E, Pekedis O. Reverse nasal SMAS-perichondrium flap to avoid supratip deformity in rhinoplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2012;36(2):271- 7. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-011-9814-9
  58. Lohuis PJ, Hakim S, Duivesteijn W, Knobbe A, Tasman AJ. Benefits of a short, practical questionnaire to measure subjective perception of nasal appearance after aesthetic rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;132(6):913e-23e. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000434403.83692.95
  59. de Brito MJ, de Almeida Arruda Felix G, Nahas FX, Tavares H, Cordás TA, Dini GM, et al. Body dysmorphic disorder should not be considered an exclusion criterion for cosmetic surgery. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2015;68(2):270- 2. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2014.09.046
  60. Inanlı S, Serin GM, Polat S, Aksoy E. Placement technique of extended spreader grafts. Kulak Burun Bogaz Ihtis Derg. 2011;21(6):333-7. Available from: https://doi.org/10.5606/kbbihtisas.2011.051
  61. Grigoryants V, Baroni A. The use of short spreader grafts in rhinoplasty for patients with thick nasal skin. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2013;37(3):516-20. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-013-0103-7
  62. Yoo DB, Jen A. Endonasal placement of spreader grafts: experience in 41 consecutive patients. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2012;14(5):318-22. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1001/archfacial.2012.173
  63. Lee PC, Chang RH, Chang YL. Treatment of nasal deviation with underlying bony asymmetry secondary to augmentation rhinoplasty in Asian patients. Aesthet Surg J. 2018;38(8):823-32. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/ asj/sjy006
  64. Cerkes N. The crooked nose: principles of treatment. Aesthet Surg J. 2011;31(2):241-57. Available from: https://doi. org/10.1177/1090820X10394167
  65. Chung YS, Seol JH, Choi JM, Shin DH, Kim YW, Cho JH, et al. How to resolve the caudal septal deviation? Clinical outcomes after septoplasty with bony batten grafting. Laryngoscope. 2014;124(8):1771-6. Available from: https:// doi.org/10.1002/lary.24491
  66. Robotti E, Penna WB. Current practical concepts for using rib in secondary rhinoplasty. Facial Plast Surg. 2019;35(1):31-46. Available from: https://doi. org/10.1055/s-0039-1677801
  67. Pedroza F, Pedroza LF, Achiques MT, Felipe E, Becerra F. The tripod graft: nasal tip cartilage reconstruction during revision rhinoplasty. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2014;16(2):93-101. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamafacial. 2013.2348
  68. Tan M, Li Y, Zou F, Yao D, Li J. Analysis of clinical efficacy in 37 cases of revision nasal septum surgery with reformed incision. Lin Chung Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2013;27(23):1316-8.
  69. Ivanov SA, Savenko YuN. Rekonstruktsiya kryla nosa plasticheskim materialom na osnove modifitsirovannogo pazl-loskuta [The reconstruction of the wing of the nose with the use of the plastic material based on the modified puzzle flap]. Rossiyskaya rinologiya 2017;25(4):30-4.
  70. Nassif P, Kulbersh J. Rhinoplasty and bony vault complications. Facial Plast Surg. 2012;28(3):303-9. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0032-1312698
  71. Rettinger G. Risks and complications in rhinoplasty. GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007;6:Doc08
  72. Teymoortash A, Fasunla JA, Sazgar AA. The value of spreader grafts in rhinoplasty: a critical review. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2012;269(5):1411-6. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-011-1837-y
  73. Rosenberger ES, Toriumi DM. Controversies in revision rhinoplasty. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2016;24(3):337-45. Available from: https://doi. org/10.1016/j.fsc.2016.03.010
  74. Daniel RK. The preservation rhinoplasty: A new rhinoplasty revolution. Aesthet Surg J. 2018;38(2):228-9. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/ sjx258
  75. Toriumi DM. Structure rhinoplasty: Lessons learned in 30 years. Chicago, IL: DMT Solutions. 2019. ISBN: 9781576261835. NLM ID: 101741699
  76. Daniel RK, Palhazi P. The Nasal ligaments and tip support in rhinoplasty: An anatomical study. Aesthet Surg J. 2018;38(4):357-68. Available from: https:// doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjx192
  77. Palhazi P, Daniel RK, Kosins AM. The osseocartilaginous vault of the nose: anatomy and surgical observations. Aesthet Surg J. 2015;35(3):242-51. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sju079
  78. Cakir B, Oreroğlu AR, Doğan T, Akan M. A complete subperichondrial dissection technique for rhinoplasty with management of the nasal ligaments. Aesthet Surg J. 2012;32(5):564-74. Available from: https://doi. org/10.1177/1090820X12445471
  79. Davis RE. Lateral crural tensioning for refinement of the wide and underprojected nasal tip: rethinking the lateral crural steal. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2015;23(1):23-53. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j. fsc.2014.09.003
  80. Saban Y, Daniel RK, Polselli R, Trapasso M, Palhazi P. Dorsal preservation: The push down technique reassessed. Aesthet Surg J. 2018;38(2):117-31. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjx180

Authors' information:


Artykov Karimdzhon Pulatovich
Doctor of Medical Sciences, Full Professor, Professor of the Department of Surgical Diseases № 2 named after Academician N.U. Usmanov, Avicenna Tajik State Medical University; a Leading Specialist in the Training of Scientific Personnel, Republican Scientific Center for Cardiovascular Surgery
Scopus ID: 6506551678
ORCID ID: 0000-0002-6346-0851
SPIN: 2480-6526
Author ID: 909829
E-mail: artikov53@mail.ru

Azizov Kudratullo Nazrulloevich
Applicant of the Republican Scientific Center for Cardiovascular Surgery
Researcher ID: ABC-3121-2020
ORCID ID: 0000-0002-1731-6226
SPIN-код: 7417-8074
Author ID: 1087271
E-mail: kudratullo.azizov@bk.ru

Ismoilov Erkin Khabibulloevich
Surgeon of the Department of Reconstructive Surgery, Republican Scientific Center for Cardiovascular Surgery
Researcher ID: ABD-3790-2020
ORCID ID: 0000-0001-9363-4544
SPIN-код: 8474-2440
Author ID: 1088893
E-mail: erkin_ismoilov@bk.ru

Information about support in the form of grants, equipment, medications

The authors did not receive financial support from manufacturers of medicines and medical equipment

Conflicts of interest: No conflict

Address for correspondence:


Artykov Karimdzhon Pulatovich
Doctor of Medical Sciences, Full Professor, Professor of the Department of Surgical Diseases № 2 named after Academician N.U. Usmanov, Avicenna Tajik State Medical University; a Leading Specialist in the Training of Scientific Personnel, Republican Scientific Center for Cardiovascular Surgery

734003, Republic of Tajikistan, Dushanbe, Rudaki Ave., 139

Tel.: +992 (919) 401616

E-mail: artikov53@mail.ru